Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 10, 2018 at 9:09 comment added Bazin @mcd You are right, the inclusion holds true only for $m\le 0.$ We can get that $\text{Op}\Sigma^0$ is bounded on $L^p$. Then we may define $\mathcal W^{s,p}=\{u\in \mathscr S'(\mathbb R^n), \forall a\in \Sigma^s, (\text{Op} a) u\in L^p\}$ and hopefully prove that Op$(\Sigma^m)$ sends continuously $\mathcal W^{s,p}$ into $\mathcal W^{s-m,p}$.
Jul 10, 2018 at 8:56 comment added mcd @Bazin for $m > 0$ the inclusion is not true, since you have "global" $S_{1,0}^m$ estimates; but the Shubin symbol are allowed to grow in $x$, for example the harmonic oscillator is not in $S^2_{1,0}$, but obviously in $\Sigma^1$.
Jul 9, 2018 at 19:16 comment added Bazin @Saal Hardali You mean certainly the $L^p$ boundedness. It is a delicate matter since some classes of pseudo-differential operators are bounded on $L^2$ and not on $L^p$. Here it is simpler since $\Sigma^m\subset S^{2m}_{1,0}$ and an operator with symbol in the larger set is indeed bounded from $W^{s,p}$ into $W^{s-2m,p}$. Maybe I was too quick for the completeness, but I do not see why it would be different, only the Sobolev filtration is different with the definition of the spaces $\mathscr H^m$ in my answer.
Jul 9, 2018 at 17:49 comment added Saal Hardali hmmm, i'm not sure I understand your point about the boundness, could you say a few words about the boundness? This is the part i'm least sure about. Also the completeness isn't at all obvious to me for the second class of symbols you propose.
Jul 9, 2018 at 17:26 comment added Bazin @Saal Hardali Considering the harmonic Oscillator $\mathcal H=-\Delta_x+\vert x\vert^2$, you can define the scale of Hilbert spaces $\mathscr H^m$ as the temperate distributions $u$ such that $\mathcal H^m u\in L^2$ and you can prove that $\mathscr H^m$ is also the set of $u$ such that $(\text{Op}a) u$ belongs to $L^2$ for any $a\in \Sigma^m.$ Another point is to prove that $\text{Op}\Sigma^0$ is included in the bounded operators on $L^p$ for $1<p<+\infty$, but it is a consequence of the same result for $S^0$.
Jul 9, 2018 at 12:16 comment added Saal Hardali Could you elaborate on why the second algebra you give satisfies 3? it doesn't seem obvious but maybe im missing something.
Jul 9, 2018 at 12:12 history answered Bazin CC BY-SA 4.0