Timeline for Inertial decomposition of graphs
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2018 at 13:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 22, 2018 at 12:12 | comment | added | Peter Heinig | Dear Daniel, I made some small corrections, the least small of which was to make it explicit that 'disjoint' means 'vertex-disjoint'. The latter tends to be the most usual interpretation of 'disjoint subgraphs'. I am not entirely sure you meant it that way, though; of course you can re-correct it if necessary. | |
| Jul 22, 2018 at 12:10 | history | edited | Peter Heinig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Small grammtical and typographical corrections; made it explicit that the "disjoint" subgraphs are meant to be vertex-disjoint.
|
| Jul 9, 2018 at 7:46 | answer | added | LeechLattice | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 9, 2018 at 3:26 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typos
|
| Jul 9, 2018 at 1:10 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | $d$ is meant to be $b$? (or, vice versa?) | |
| Jul 9, 2018 at 0:44 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 37 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2018 at 17:32 | history | asked | Daniel Alejandro Jaume | CC BY-SA 4.0 |