Timeline for Does the Tannaka-Krein theorem come from an equivalence of 2-categories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2022 at 7:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/ with https://arxiv.org/abs/
|
|
| Nov 21, 2019 at 14:59 | comment | added | Andrea Marino | Hi guys, is there also something more specific to representation of (finite) groups? I mean, by tannaka krein we know that we can reconstruct the group via the tannaka group of the fiber functor, but what's the (2?) Category in which group representations - categories sits in, such that we have an equivalence between the category of finite groups and the latter? Sorry for the - maybe - naive question :) | |
| Jul 7, 2010 at 0:00 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
| Jul 4, 2010 at 3:28 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | That paper looks great, thank! I was hoping that there would be an equivalence that gets bimodules into the game. For example, that would, to my mind, be the most natural way to reconstruct Hopfish coalgebras. But maybe it is not to be. | |
| Jul 3, 2010 at 20:49 | history | answered | Evan Jenkins | CC BY-SA 2.5 |