Timeline for Example of tensor category with non-simple unit $J\to \mathbb{1} \to Q$ and suitably extension $Q\to M\to J$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2018 at 7:50 | comment | added | Simon Lentner | I myself think I understand quite well also in more general settings the quotient W(0)\mapsto 0, which is described as quantum group representations. But I do not understand the effect by which the W(0) enters, and this is what I ask about. | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 7:47 | comment | added | Simon Lentner | Obviousely, thank you alot for the help: I am interested in the category with conjectured (!) tensor product in arXiv:0905.0916. On p.17-19 they describe the effect I asked about for the Virasoro algebra, p.38 they describe the same for the so-called logarithmic models, both by explicit lists of tensor products. There, the unit object is called V, the subobject J is called V(2), the quotient Q is called V(0), the extension the-other-ways-around is called V*. Respecitvely W,W(0),W(2),W*. | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 10:37 | comment | added | Neil Strickland | My guess is that there is a mistake in the thought process that led you to this precise list of conditions. Perhaps you could outline your argument? | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 7:50 | history | edited | Simon Lentner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 309 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Jul 6, 2018 at 7:45 | history | edited | Simon Lentner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 309 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| S Jul 5, 2018 at 21:54 | history | edited | Simon Lentner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I add two tags.
|
| Jul 5, 2018 at 21:48 | answer | added | Neil Strickland | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 5, 2018 at 21:30 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 5, 2018 at 21:54 | |||||
| Jul 5, 2018 at 21:24 | history | asked | Simon Lentner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |