Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 25, 2023 at 10:53 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Too much `\text`, or too little intra-`\text` math mode
Jun 22, 2023 at 6:10 history edited RKS CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Jun 22, 2023 at 5:31 history edited RKS CC BY-SA 4.0
added 12 characters in body; edited title
Jun 21, 2023 at 13:33 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
TeX and link to article, while this is on the front page
Jun 21, 2023 at 13:24 history edited RKS CC BY-SA 4.0
Editing after a long time as I still do not have an answer...
Jul 5, 2018 at 14:40 comment added Phil Tosteson Sorry I must have misread your map
Jul 5, 2018 at 4:12 comment added RKS It has non-compact fiber, how it is proper?
Jul 4, 2018 at 13:57 history edited RKS CC BY-SA 4.0
added 6 characters in body
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:51 comment added Najib Idrissi I know it's different, what I'm seeing is that I expect the same techniques to work. Your map is like translation + symmetry followed by projection.
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:22 history edited RKS CC BY-SA 4.0
added 182 characters in body
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:09 comment added RKS Thanks for your response! Fadell-Neuwirth considers projection maps. Do you mean the same for the second map. In the above case it is different.
Jul 4, 2018 at 7:44 comment added Najib Idrissi I would try doing it in two steps, first $\mathbb{C}^n \setminus \{ z_i = \pm z_j \} \to \mathbb{C}^n \setminus \{ z_i = z_j \}$, $(z_1,\dots) \mapsto (z_1^2, \dots)$ looks like a covering space of degree $2$. Then you have the usual Fadell–Neuwirth fibration which forgets a point in a configuration space (see their paper for the proof that it's a fibration). Of course writing this I now realize that the first map has a problem at $z_i = 0$ so maybe it's more complicated.
Jul 4, 2018 at 7:38 history edited RKS CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Jul 4, 2018 at 7:25 review First posts
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:12
Jul 4, 2018 at 7:23 history asked RKS CC BY-SA 4.0