Timeline for Plucker coordinates of flag varieties
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 1, 2018 at 15:35 | comment | added | cccp | Dear Jason. I think $(1)$ is clear no ? I mean $V_i$ is the irreducible representation associated to a non trivial dominant weight. In any case thank you very much for your answer about $(2)$ (it will take some time for me to parse since I don't know some of the notions you are using). | |
Jul 1, 2018 at 15:17 | comment | added | Jason Starr | You are ask several questions: (1) why is $V_i$ nonzero, (2) why is the morphism $f:G/B \to\prod_i \mathbb{P}(V_i)$ an embedding, (3) why is the image of $f$ defined by the relations above? Let me address only (2), assuming (1). First, the cone of effective curve classes on $G/B$ is spanned by the "Demazure curves", i.e., the fibers of the $\mathbb{P}^1$-bundles $G/B\to G/P_i$ used by Demazure in his "simple proof" of Borel-Weil-Bott. The fundamental weights span the dual cone, so the fibers of $f$ contain no curves, i.e., they are finite. Now use homogeneity and simple connectedness. | |
Jul 1, 2018 at 15:11 | history | edited | cccp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Jul 1, 2018 at 14:07 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 1, 2018 at 14:15 | |||||
Jul 1, 2018 at 14:07 | history | asked | cccp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |