Timeline for Confusion about Montgomery's pair correlation conjecture
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2018 at 7:15 | comment | added | Will Sawin | More specifically, Montgomery conjectured that $F(\alpha)$ should be $1$ for $|\alpha|$ between $1$ and $2$ based on the twin primes conjecture, and that it should be close to $1$ on average based on the overall count of zeroes. This led to the hypothesis that it is $1$ for $|\alpha|=1$. This is explained, briefly but straightforwardly, in Montgomery's original paper. | |
| Jul 1, 2018 at 18:07 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
link to "alternative hypothesis" information
|
| Jul 1, 2018 at 10:33 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I finally get the figure included
|
| Jul 1, 2018 at 9:59 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
correct spelling
|
| Jul 1, 2018 at 9:48 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 1, 2018 at 9:45 | comment | added | juan | It is true that when I used zeros on the range $n=103 752 000 248 the figure was near the one predicted by Montgomery conjecture. | |
| Jul 1, 2018 at 9:41 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 817 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2018 at 9:25 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 817 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2018 at 19:37 | history | answered | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |