Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jul 6, 2018 at 20:54 vote accept Praphulla Koushik
Jul 4, 2018 at 5:25 answer added David Roberts timeline score: 2
Jun 30, 2018 at 7:48 history edited Praphulla Koushik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 139 characters in body
Jun 29, 2018 at 11:35 comment added Praphulla Koushik @NicolaCiccoli Please let me know if you can say little more than that...
Jun 29, 2018 at 11:30 history edited Praphulla Koushik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 630 characters in body
Jun 28, 2018 at 9:41 comment added Praphulla Koushik @NicolaCiccoli Sir, It looks like I understand but I do not :D :D All I can say is that you mean suppose there is a bibundle $P:\mathcal{G}\rightarrow \mathcal{H}$ that is a principal $\mathcal{G}$ bundle then $\mathcal{G}$ and $\mathcal{H}$ are Morita equivalent. Am I correct? If that is the case, that would give sufficient justification for not considering bibundle that is principal on both sides.. Now, can you tell me what pull back you are talking here when you say pull back of $\mathcal{G}$ and $\mathcal{H}$?
Jun 28, 2018 at 8:38 comment added Nicola Ciccoli You use pullback to give a groupoid morphism between a pullback of $\mathcal G$ and $\mathcal H$. The role of the two actions are not symmetric because tour generalized morphism has a direction. If you ask both principality conditions you get an invertible generalized morphism, thus a Morita equivalence.
Jun 27, 2018 at 13:06 history edited Praphulla Koushik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 302 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 11:53 history edited Praphulla Koushik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1400 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 7:59 history edited Praphulla Koushik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 206 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 4:46 history asked Praphulla Koushik CC BY-SA 4.0