Timeline for Prove: If $P_n$ is $n$-$th$ prime number then $P_{n+m} \ge P_n+P_m$

13 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Aug 14, 2021 at 10:02	history	edited	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0	edited body
Jun 28, 2018 at 1:45	vote	accept	Đào Thanh Oai
Jun 27, 2018 at 23:22	history	edited	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0	deleted 4 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 22:40	history	edited	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0	deleted 1 character in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 22:33	history	edited	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 392 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 22:07	history	edited	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 389 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 21:43	history	edited	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 303 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 16:21	comment	added	Đào Thanh Oai		I am sorry. I think your proof maybe false at (2)==> (1). I think (2) ==> $\pi(x+y) \le \pi(x)+\pi(y)+1$ ?
Jun 27, 2018 at 15:12	comment	added	GH from MO		@Freeman: $(1)$ is believed to be false, because it contradicts the $k$-tuple conjecture. For a nice short explanation see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
Jun 27, 2018 at 4:25	comment	added	Đào Thanh Oai		My comment is true? $P_{m+n}$ may $>>$ $P_{n+m-1}$ but $P_n+P_m \approx P_n+P_m-1$ ??
Jun 27, 2018 at 4:13	history	edited	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0	added 3 characters in body
Jun 27, 2018 at 3:55	comment	added	kodlu		Nice. I will stop typing up my answer.
Jun 27, 2018 at 3:54	history	answered	GH from MO	CC BY-SA 4.0