Timeline for Strong Total Failures vs. Weak Instances of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jun 21, 2018 at 16:44 | history | edited | Morteza Azad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Jun 21, 2018 at 15:54 | history | edited | Morteza Azad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
Jun 21, 2018 at 14:09 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 21, 2018 at 19:50 | |||||
Jun 21, 2018 at 13:57 | history | edited | Morteza Azad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
Jun 21, 2018 at 13:41 | answer | added | Monroe Eskew | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 21, 2018 at 13:34 | history | edited | Morteza Azad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Jun 21, 2018 at 13:26 | comment | added | Morteza Azad | It is worth mentioning that not all arrows in the above diagram are strict. As Mohammad pointed out in a personal discussion with me, despite their weak-looking appearances, all $GCH_{n}^{0}$s are equivalent to $GCH$, so the arrows in the first column of the right diagram are actually two-sided. The argument relies on proving the fact that under $GCH_{n+1}^{0}$ the function $\kappa\mapsto 2^{\kappa}$ satisfies a variant of being strictly increasing which itself implies $GCH_{n}^{0}$. | |
Jun 21, 2018 at 12:24 | history | asked | Morteza Azad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |