Return to Answer

The answer is yes (and some of the comments were moving in the right direction): Let $T$ be a transversal to $H$ in $G,$ and let $\sigma$ afford the representation of $H.$ For each $t \in T,$ there is a matrix $M_{t} \in {\rm GL}(9,\mathbb{C})$ such that $\sigma(tht^{-1}) = M_{t}\sigma(h)M_{t}^{-1}$ for all $h \in H,$ and $M_{t}$ is unique up to scalar multiples (by Schur's Lemma) , while any non-zero scalar multiple will have the same property. Extend this to $G$ by letting $M_{th} = M_{t}\sigma(h)$ for each $t \in T, h \in H.$ (It might be convenient here for anyone interested in full detail, to assume that have multiplied $\sigma$ by a suitable power of the linear character $ \lambda = {\rm det} \sigma,$ so that ${\rm det} \sigma$ may be assumed to have multiplicative order a power of $3$).

Note also that for $x,y \in G,$ there is a scalar $\alpha(x,y) \neq 0$ such that $M_{xy} = \alpha(x,y)M_{x}M_{y} (\ast).$

Notice then $M_{x}^{|G|}$ is a scalar matrix for each $x \in G.$ Multiplying each $M_{x}$ by a suitable scalar, we may, and do from now on, assume that each $M_{x}$ has determinant a $3$-power root of unity.

It follows from $(\ast)$ (on taking determinants), that $\alpha(x,y)$ is a $3$-power root of unity for all $x,y \in G.$ This gives a $2$-cocycle for ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ of $3$-power order.

Now we can finish in either of two ways: the Schur multiplier of the perfect group ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ is well-known to have order $2.$ But a more general argument is to note that a perfect group with a cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup always has a Schur multiplier of order prime to $p$ ( and this may be applied here with $p =3$ ).

The answer is yes (and some of the comments were moving in the right direction): Let $T$ be a transversal to $H$ in $G,$ and let $\sigma$ afford the representation of $H.$ For each $t \in T,$ there is a matrix $M_{t} \in {\rm GL}(9,\mathbb{C})$ such that $\sigma(tht^{-1}) = M_{t}\sigma(h)M_{t}^{-1}$ for all $h \in H,$ and $M_{t}$ is unique up to scalar multiples (by Schur's Lemma) , while any non-zero scalar multiple will have the same property. Extend this to $G$ by letting $M_{th} = M_{t}\sigma(h)$ for each $t \in T, h \in H.$ (It might be convenient here for anyone interested in full detail, to assume that have multiplied $\sigma$ by a suitable power of the linear character $ \lambda = {\rm det} \sigma,$ so that ${\rm det} \sigma$ may be assumed to have multiplicative order a power of $3$).

Note also that for $x,y \in G,$ there is a scalar $\alpha(x,y) \neq 0$ such that $M_{xy} = \alpha(x,y)M_{x}M_{y} (\ast).$

Notice then $M_{x}^{|G|}$ is a scalar matrix for each $x \in G.$ Multiplying each $M_{x}$ by a suitable scalar (and we can still keep $M_{h} = \sigma(h)$ for each $h \in H$, and $M_{th} = M_{t}\sigma(h)$ for $t \in T,h \in H$), we may, and do from now on, assume that each $M_{x}$ has determinant a $3$-power root of unity.

It follows from $(\ast)$ (on taking determinants), that $\alpha(x,y)$ is a $3$-power root of unity for all $x,y \in G.$ This gives a $2$-cocycle for ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ of $3$-power order.

Now we can finish in either of two ways: the Schur multiplier of the perfect group ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ is well-known to have order $2.$ But a more general argument is to note that a perfect group with a cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup always has a Schur multiplier of order prime to $p$ ( and this may be applied here with $p =3$ ).

The answer is yes (and some of the comments were moving in the right direction): Let $T$ be a transversal to $H$ in $G,$ and let $\sigma$ afford the representation of $H.$ For each $t \in T,$ there is a matrix $M_{t} \in {\rm GL}(9,\mathbb{C})$ such that $\sigma(tht^{-1}) = M_{t}\sigma(h)M_{t}^{-1}$ for all $h \in H,$ and $M_{t}$ is unique up to scalar multiples (by Schur's Lemma) , while any non-zero scalar multiple will have the same property. Extend this to $G$ by letting $M_{th} = M_{t}\sigma(h)$ for each $t \in T, h \in H.$

Note also that for $x,y \in G,$ there is a scalar $\alpha(x,y) \neq 0$ such that $M_{xy} = \alpha(x,y)M_{x}M_{y} (\ast).$

Notice then $M_{x}^{|G|}$ is a scalar matrix for each $x \in G.$ Multiplying each $M_{x}$ by a suitable scalar, we may, and do from now on, assume that each $M_{x}$ has determinant $1$.

It follows from $(\ast)$ (on taking determinants), that $\alpha(x,y)$ is a (not necessarily primitive) $9$-th root of unity for all $x,y \in G.$ This gives a $2$-cocycle for ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ of $3$-power order.

Now we can finish in either of two ways: the Schur multiplier of the perfect group ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ is well-known to have order $2.$ But a more general argument is to note that a perfect group with a cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup always has a Schur multiplier of order prime to $p$ ( and this may be applied here with $p =3$ ).

The answer is yes (and some of the comments were moving in the right direction): Let $T$ be a transversal to $H$ in $G,$ and let $\sigma$ afford the representation of $H.$ For each $t \in T,$ there is a matrix $M_{t} \in {\rm GL}(9,\mathbb{C})$ such that $\sigma(tht^{-1}) = M_{t}\sigma(h)M_{t}^{-1}$ for all $h \in H,$ and $M_{t}$ is unique up to scalar multiples (by Schur's Lemma) , while any non-zero scalar multiple will have the same property. Extend this to $G$ by letting $M_{th} = M_{t}\sigma(h)$ for each $t \in T, h \in H.$ (It might be convenient here for anyone interested in full detail, to assume that have multiplied $\sigma$ by a suitable power of the linear character $ \lambda = {\rm det} \sigma,$ so that ${\rm det} \sigma$ may be assumed to have multiplicative order a power of $3$).

Note also that for $x,y \in G,$ there is a scalar $\alpha(x,y) \neq 0$ such that $M_{xy} = \alpha(x,y)M_{x}M_{y} (\ast).$

Notice then $M_{x}^{|G|}$ is a scalar matrix for each $x \in G.$ Multiplying each $M_{x}$ by a suitable scalar, we may, and do from now on, assume that each $M_{x}$ has determinant a $3$-power root of unity.

It follows from $(\ast)$ (on taking determinants), that $\alpha(x,y)$ is a $3$-power root of unity for all $x,y \in G.$ This gives a $2$-cocycle for ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ of $3$-power order.

Now we can finish in either of two ways: the Schur multiplier of the perfect group ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ is well-known to have order $2.$ But a more general argument is to note that a perfect group with a cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup always has a Schur multiplier of order prime to $p$ ( and this may be applied here with $p =3$ ).

The answer is yes (and some of the comments were moving in the right direction): Let $T$ be a transversal to $H$ in $G,$ and let $\sigma$ afford the representation of $H.$ For each $t \in T,$ there is a matrix $M_{t} \in {\rm GL}(9,\mathbb{C})$ such that $\sigma(tht^{-1}) = M_{t}\sigma(h)M_{t}^{-1}$ for all $h \in H,$ and $M_{t}$ is unique up to scalar multiples (by Schur's Lemma) , while any non-zero scalar multiple will have the same property. Extend this to $G$ by letting $M_{th} = M_{t}\sigma(h)$ for each $t \in T, h \in H.$

Note also that for $x,y \in T,$ there is a scalar $\alpha(s,t) \neq 0$ such that $M_{xy} = \alpha(s,t)M_{x}M_{y} (\ast).$

Notice then $M_{x}^{|G|}$ is a scalar matrix for each $x \in G.$ Multiplying each $M_{x}$ by a suitable scalar, we may, and do from now on, assume that each $M_{x}$ has determinant $1$.

It follows from $(\ast)$ (on taking determinants), that $\alpha(x,y)$ is a (not necessarily primitive) $9$-th root of unity for all $x,y \in G.$ This gives a $2$-cocycle for ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ of $3$-power order.

Now we can finish in either of two ways: the Schur multiplier of the perfect group ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ is well-known to have order $2.$ But a more general argument is to note that a perfect group with a cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup always has a Schur multiplier of order prime to $p$ ( and this may be applied here with $p =3$ ).

The answer is yes (and some of the comments were moving in the right direction): Let $T$ be a transversal to $H$ in $G,$ and let $\sigma$ afford the representation of $H.$ For each $t \in T,$ there is a matrix $M_{t} \in {\rm GL}(9,\mathbb{C})$ such that $\sigma(tht^{-1}) = M_{t}\sigma(h)M_{t}^{-1}$ for all $h \in H,$ and $M_{t}$ is unique up to scalar multiples (by Schur's Lemma) , while any non-zero scalar multiple will have the same property. Extend this to $G$ by letting $M_{th} = M_{t}\sigma(h)$ for each $t \in T, h \in H.$

Note also that for $x,y \in G,$ there is a scalar $\alpha(x,y) \neq 0$ such that $M_{xy} = \alpha(x,y)M_{x}M_{y} (\ast).$

Notice then $M_{x}^{|G|}$ is a scalar matrix for each $x \in G.$ Multiplying each $M_{x}$ by a suitable scalar, we may, and do from now on, assume that each $M_{x}$ has determinant $1$.

It follows from $(\ast)$ (on taking determinants), that $\alpha(x,y)$ is a (not necessarily primitive) $9$-th root of unity for all $x,y \in G.$ This gives a $2$-cocycle for ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ of $3$-power order.

Now we can finish in either of two ways: the Schur multiplier of the perfect group ${\rm PSL}(2,11)$ is well-known to have order $2.$ But a more general argument is to note that a perfect group with a cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup always has a Schur multiplier of order prime to $p$ ( and this may be applied here with $p =3$ ).