Timeline for Spectral algebraic geometry vs derived algebraic geometry in positive characteristic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 30, 2018 at 0:05 | history | edited | skd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 128 characters in body
|
Jun 30, 2018 at 0:03 | comment | added | skd | @StefanoAriotta, yup, that's a typo, I was thinking about G_m when writing that paragraph. Thanks! | |
Jun 29, 2018 at 20:29 | comment | added | Stefano Ariotta | That's a great answer. I have just one small remark. I think that $\operatorname{Spec}(R\otimes_{\mathbb S} \Sigma_+^\infty \mathbb Z)$, with $\mathbb Z$ viewed as a discrete (grouplike) $\mathbb E_\infty$-monoid, is the "flat analogue" of $\mathbb G_m$, whereas the "flat affine line" should be $\operatorname{Spec}(R\otimes_{\mathbb S} \Sigma_+^\infty \mathbb N)$, with $\mathbb N$ viewed as a discrete $\mathbb E_\infty$-monoid. | |
Jun 21, 2018 at 3:13 | comment | added | skd | Note that Jeremy's theorem is much stronger than the result that I cited. | |
Jun 21, 2018 at 3:04 | history | edited | skd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1295 characters in body
|
Jun 19, 2018 at 17:52 | history | edited | skd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
grammar
|
Jun 19, 2018 at 17:43 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Jun 19, 2018 at 17:42 | comment | added | user74900 | wow that cleared up some of my misunderstanding regarding the difference between SAG and DAG. Great answer! | |
Jun 19, 2018 at 17:39 | history | answered | skd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |