Timeline for Proper and etale groupoid is locally a translation groupoid
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 3, 2019 at 11:27 | vote | accept | Praphulla Koushik | ||
Nov 18, 2018 at 19:09 | answer | added | Alexander Schmeding | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 20, 2018 at 4:00 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | I did not mean it takes only 3/4 days to understand completely @DavidRoberts I mean to get some rough idea it will take 3/4 days for one paper.. :D... to your response, I will do that. Thank you :) | |
Jun 20, 2018 at 3:58 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
Jun 20, 2018 at 3:55 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | If it only takes you 3-4 days to read two papers then you are doing well. If you are learning this stuff for the first time you should take a couple of weeks to read them really well, consulting the literature and the textbooks. As to your other question, that's not for me to say; I don't know of anyone, but then I'm geographically isolated and do not know who might be doing so. Why not look at the webpages of people who author the papers you are reading, look at the departmental webpages, at their personal webpages and so on and try to piece it together yourself? | |
Jun 20, 2018 at 3:20 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | @DavidRoberts this is off topic but, Is there any current PhD student you are aware of who is working in Geometry of Orbifolds/Lie groupoids in the set up of Moerdijk or his students.. | |
Jun 20, 2018 at 3:19 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | @DavidRoberts I just saw those papers.. they seem to be so many terms that I do not know... that might take 3/4 days to read them, I am afraid it would be a diversion...can you think of some hint that might be helpful in understanding this result.. | |
Jun 20, 2018 at 3:02 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | arxiv.org/abs/1103.5245 arxiv.org/abs/1101.0180 | |
Jun 20, 2018 at 1:44 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | @DavidRoberts Can you give some reference please | |
Jun 19, 2018 at 23:11 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | There is a more general version of this for proper Lie groupoids, and it is a generalisation of the slice theorem for proper group actions. There are various versions, and incremental results due to Weinstein, Zung, Pflaum-Postuma-Tang, Crainic-Struchiner | |
Jun 19, 2018 at 15:42 | history | asked | Praphulla Koushik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |