Timeline for How to construct a Poisson process not based on Lebesgue measure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2021 at 3:37 | answer | added | Michael Hardy | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 19, 2018 at 18:29 | vote | accept | Vera | ||
| Jun 19, 2018 at 14:09 | comment | added | Vera | @MateuszKwaśnicki Because I do not completely understand it. See my comment on that question. I don't understand how $N_t$ is defined on base of what is written in that answer. | |
| Jun 19, 2018 at 12:36 | comment | added | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | Kostya_I provides a much more general approach, why don't you accept that answer? | |
| Jun 19, 2018 at 9:42 | comment | added | Vera | @MateuszKwaśnicki It works! Please be so kind to turn your comment into an answer, so that I can accept this answer. | |
| Jun 17, 2018 at 12:06 | answer | added | Kostya_I | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 16, 2018 at 15:18 | comment | added | Vera | @MateuszKwaśnicki That looks indeed promising and simple too! Thank you. I will have a closer look, and if I do not encounter any obstacles then I will ask you to turn your comment into an answer (that will be accepted). | |
| Jun 16, 2018 at 15:12 | comment | added | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | The simplest way is to consider $N_{m(t)}$, where $N_t$ is the usual rate-1 Poisson process and $m(t) = \nu([0, t])$. | |
| Jun 16, 2018 at 14:49 | history | edited | Vera | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 40 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2018 at 14:38 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 16, 2018 at 14:56 | |||||
| Jun 16, 2018 at 14:36 | history | asked | Vera | CC BY-SA 4.0 |