Timeline for On semi-discrete Wasserstein distance
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2021 at 22:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 4, 2021 at 21:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 5, 2021 at 20:19 | answer | added | JHM | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 21:01 | comment | added | user111097 | @Steve Yes. $V_i$ are all convex polygons | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 20:06 | comment | added | Steve | Ok thanks. To understand the problem a bit better, could you give a source for the simplified form of the optimizer you are using? Do you perhaps know if the $V_i$ are convex under some conditions? | |
| Jun 17, 2018 at 10:02 | history | edited | user111097 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 458 characters in body
|
| Jun 17, 2018 at 9:54 | comment | added | user111097 | @Steve Thanks for the reply. All $p_i$ are strictly positive, and the density $\rho$ could be assumed to be smooth enough or even have a bounded support. | |
| Jun 16, 2018 at 12:29 | comment | added | Steve | Could you specify a bit more what you are hoping for? Really a condition just on $x_i$ and independent of $p_i$ and $\nu$? | |
| Jun 15, 2018 at 9:33 | history | asked | user111097 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |