Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 18, 2018 at 11:43 answer added S. Douteau timeline score: 2
Jun 18, 2018 at 12:55 comment added Andrea Gagna The nerve of a poset is a Kan complex iff it is trivial. If you take a fibrant replacement of it (i.e. you consider it as an object of the $\infty$-cosmos of $\infty$-groupoids), so that you can correctly define its homotopy groups, this will not be 1-connected in general.
Jun 12, 2018 at 22:43 comment added Tim Campion @DenisNardin You're right, that doesn't make any sense. So the whole "salvaged paradox" thing falls apart because there isn't really a colimit to be approaching -- $Sd^\infty$ doesn't exist as a colimit (though it does as a limit, it's hard to see how to map out of this). Nevertheless, I'm having trouble dispelling the sense that there should be an argument to be had somewhere in this neighborhood. Is there something to say about hashing out homotopy groups of coskeletal simplicial sets in terms of lifting properties against skeletal things...
Jun 12, 2018 at 22:12 history rollback Tim Campion
Rollback to Revision 2
Jun 12, 2018 at 22:07 history edited Tim Campion CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 48 characters in body
Jun 12, 2018 at 21:59 comment added Tim Campion @SamGunningham Exactly :)
Jun 12, 2018 at 21:25 comment added Denis Nardin I don't understand the map in (1.). What is the map $K\to Sd K$ that you're using? (the map I know goes the other way...)
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:23 comment added Sam Gunningham Wait, scratch that - the statement about truncation is only true for Kan complexes...
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:22 comment added Sam Gunningham Is your claim really false? The $n$-coskeleton is a model for the $(n-1)$-truncation of the homotopy type (see here: mathoverflow.net/questions/243164/…). So an $n$-connected $n$-coskeletal simplicial set will have all homotopy groups zero, right?
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:14 history edited Tim Campion CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:05 history asked Tim Campion CC BY-SA 4.0