Timeline for Functional decaying under the heat flow (?)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2018 at 15:31 | comment | added | Romain Gicquaud | I did not spend time doing much numerics. With the particular choice of function you have in the Python source code, for p=6, I get decay but there is a slight increase when p=7. I will come back probably tomorrow to you with an argument that shows that you can choose some better range in 1d than what is found by @MarkusSprecher in higher dimension. | |
| Jun 5, 2018 at 18:33 | comment | added | fedja | @RomainGicquaud I'm curious what was the least value of $p$ that you could get. | |
| Jun 4, 2018 at 15:23 | comment | added | Romain Gicquaud | You are perfectly right. I did some numerics to see it explicitly. You can find the Python code here <lmpt.univ-tours.fr/~gicquaud/doc/test.py > | |
| Jun 2, 2018 at 6:26 | vote | accept | Romain Gicquaud | ||
| Jun 1, 2018 at 21:18 | history | answered | fedja | CC BY-SA 4.0 |