Timeline for Why does the area function of a parallelogram have a nonintuitive geometric solution?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 15, 2023 at 18:15 | history | suggested | The Amplitwist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed some broken links to Imgur
|
| Jul 15, 2023 at 8:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 15, 2023 at 18:15 | |||||
| Dec 26, 2022 at 11:38 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | The pictures linked in this post seem to be dead. (I was able to find only one of them in the Wayback Machine.) | |
| Jul 3, 2010 at 4:59 | vote | accept | Shaun Lebron | ||
| Jul 1, 2010 at 8:56 | history | edited | Charles Matthews | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
sp
|
| Jul 1, 2010 at 5:34 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | Warning: what you call "area" and "area function" refers to $\textit{oriented}$ area. Also, I hardly think this is "research level mathematics". | |
| Jul 1, 2010 at 4:17 | answer | added | Tom Goodwillie | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 1, 2010 at 4:09 | answer | added | Ricardo Sandoval | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 1, 2010 at 4:00 | history | asked | Shaun Lebron | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
