Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 30, 2010 at 8:15 comment added Dev Sinha Natural is perhaps the wrong word (because of the connotations of functoriality). What I mean is more "found in nature." For example you wouldn't want to understand the classifying space of Z/p \times Z/p as some kind of "configurations with ordering up to equivalence" - one model found in nature is the product of Lens spaces.
Jul 30, 2010 at 7:31 comment added Victor Protsak I don't understand the comment about "natural" models: the classifying space $BG$ is only defined up to homotopy and $BH=EG/H$ for $H<G$ is rather natural!
Jul 1, 2010 at 8:58 history edited Charles Matthews CC BY-SA 2.5
pctn
Jul 1, 2010 at 5:13 comment added Dev Sinha Yes, but to get to more "natural" models requires at least a bit more than such a general construction (and presumably won't be possible for arbitrary subgroups).
Jul 1, 2010 at 3:10 comment added Bruce Westbury For any subgroup $G\subset S_n$ you can proceed by: Take $E$ to be the universal cover of any classifying space of $S_n$. Then $E/G$ is a classifying space for $G$. This is implicit in the answers and in your examples.
Jun 30, 2010 at 23:16 vote accept Dev Sinha
Jun 30, 2010 at 23:10 answer added Greg Kuperberg timeline score: 12
Jun 30, 2010 at 23:00 answer added Kevin Walker timeline score: 22
Jun 30, 2010 at 22:27 history asked Dev Sinha CC BY-SA 2.5