Timeline for (pro)Étale cohomology of adic spaces and inverse limit
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2018 at 11:58 | vote | accept | franck | ||
| Oct 4, 2018 at 21:11 | answer | added | dorebell | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 11, 2018 at 17:28 | comment | added | franck | This is possible, but I am still confused. In the paper the sheaf $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_p$ is defined as the inverse limit of the constant sheaves $\mathbb{Z}/p^n$. Maybe the problem is here, but isn't the inverse limit of constant sheaves a constat sheaf, associated to the inverse limit of the groups? I mean, the inverse limit, as preasheaves, of sheaves is already a sheaf, so I do not see what can go wrong... | |
| Jun 10, 2018 at 13:20 | comment | added | Pol van Hoften | I think there is a difference between the constant sheaf $\mathbb{Z}_p$ and the sheaf $\hat{\mathbb{Z}_p}$ as defined in paragraph $8$ of the Scholze paper. I am pretty sure the second one takes into account the topology on the $p$-adic integers and the first one does not. | |
| May 25, 2018 at 12:30 | review | First posts | |||
| May 25, 2018 at 13:10 | |||||
| May 25, 2018 at 12:29 | history | asked | franck | CC BY-SA 4.0 |