Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 23, 2018 at 23:55 comment added long trail Oops! The statement that if $p \oplus 0_{k-1}$ and $q \oplus 0_{k-1}$ are M-vN equivalent in $M_k(A)$, then $p$ and $q$ are M-vN equivalent in $A$ is True. I forgot that if $[p]_0=[q]_0$, then there exists $k$ such that $p \oplus 1_{k-1}$ and $q \oplus 1_{k-1}$ are M-vN equivalent in $M_k(A)$. This implies that $p \oplus 1_{k-1} \oplus 0_k$ and $q \oplus 1_{k-1} \oplus 0_k$ are unitarily equivalent in $M_{2k}(A)$. (All this can be found in Sec 2.2 and 3.1 of Rordam, Larsen, and Laustsen.) I believe the algebra still works to show that $q$ a lin comb of commutators implies $p$ the same.
May 17, 2018 at 20:18 comment added Ali Taghavi please see my comment to the following answer in MSE. I think that there are some contradictory situation. what is my mistake math.stackexchange.com/questions/2785117/…
May 17, 2018 at 17:46 comment added long trail It is possible, that's one of the details about the semigroup $V(A)$ of projections that can't be overlooked. However, you can check (the details are a little long in notation, but mechanical) that if two projections $p,q $ in a $C^*$-algebra are stably similar, in the sense that $P = p \oplus 0_{k-1}$ and $Q = q \oplus 0_{k-1}$ are conjugates $P = UQU^*$ via some unitary $U$ in $M_k(A)$, then $p$ is a linear combination of commutator elements if and only if $q$ is such an element. It's a little lengthy to check but I'm fairly certain it's just a matrix multiplication problem.
May 17, 2018 at 15:39 vote accept Ali Taghavi
May 17, 2018 at 4:59 comment added Ali Taghavi Thank you. It is not a comment but is a very helpful answer. Just a question is not possible that two projections $e,f$ are not Murray Von Neuman equivalent but $e\oplus 0\simeq f\oplus 0$?
May 16, 2018 at 14:55 history edited long trail CC BY-SA 4.0
commutator element --> linear combination of commutator elements in first paragraph
May 16, 2018 at 14:25 history edited long trail CC BY-SA 4.0
(edited commutator bracket to get the order right)
May 16, 2018 at 14:19 history answered long trail CC BY-SA 4.0