Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

edited title
Link
HYYY
HYYY
  • 1.5k
  • 13
  • 20

Do you understand a question on Costello's theorem

added 37 characters in body
Source Link
HYYY
HYYY
  • 1.5k
  • 13
  • 20

Costello's theorem,"open TCFT=Calabi Yau A-infinity category",he also mentions when applied to Fukaya category we can recover Gromov-Witten theory, but I see that it needs some assumption,also even if the assumption is true,I just see that the TCFT associated to Fukaya category is the same as the one associated to Gromov-Witten invariant, BUT can we from that TCFT to RECOVER Gromov-Witten invariants? (I mean the opposite direction) Because otherwise,it is not A model.

I appreciate if there is any answer.

Costello's theorem,"open TCFT=Calabi Yau A-infinity category",he also mentions when applied to Fukaya category we can recover Gromov-Witten theory, but I see that it needs some assumption,also even if the assumption is true,I just see that the TCFT associated to Fukaya category is the same as the one associated to Gromov-Witten invariant, BUT can we from that TCFT to RECOVER Gromov-Witten invariants? (I mean the opposite direction)

I appreciate if there is any answer.

Costello's theorem,"open TCFT=Calabi Yau A-infinity category",he also mentions when applied to Fukaya category we can recover Gromov-Witten theory, but I see that it needs some assumption,also even if the assumption is true,I just see that the TCFT associated to Fukaya category is the same as the one associated to Gromov-Witten invariant, BUT can we from that TCFT to RECOVER Gromov-Witten invariants? (I mean the opposite direction) Because otherwise,it is not A model.

I appreciate if there is any answer.

Source Link
HYYY
HYYY
  • 1.5k
  • 13
  • 20

Do you understand Costello's theorem

Costello's theorem,"open TCFT=Calabi Yau A-infinity category",he also mentions when applied to Fukaya category we can recover Gromov-Witten theory, but I see that it needs some assumption,also even if the assumption is true,I just see that the TCFT associated to Fukaya category is the same as the one associated to Gromov-Witten invariant, BUT can we from that TCFT to RECOVER Gromov-Witten invariants? (I mean the opposite direction)

I appreciate if there is any answer.