Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 5, 2018 at 6:16 comment added Ben McKay It is clear from the case of a rectangle that this integral is not rotation invariant, so it doesn't compute a geometric quantity.
May 4, 2018 at 17:44 review Close votes
May 5, 2018 at 10:04
May 4, 2018 at 17:36 comment added Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine @BeniBogosei: Saying that “in the case where the integrand is $A_t$, the integral is equal to the volume” seems more of a geometric interpretation than a way to explicitly compute the integral? If you want an integral over the whole body recovering your integral-of-squares-of-slices, then you can take $\int_{(x,y,z) \in \omega} A_z dx dy dz$; this again doesn’t seem to me like it helps to “explicitly compute” the original, but I still don’t follow what kind of formula you’re hoping for, so maybe it is of use?
May 4, 2018 at 15:14 comment added Beni Bogosel @PeterLeFanuLumsdaine: In the case where the integrand is $A_t$, the integral is equal to the volume. For me, a satisfactory answer would be that the integral can be computed by integrating a function on the whole body $\omega$, rather than integrating with respect to the height parameter. I'm not sure such an answer exists. At least I didn't find one, but before deciding that this isn't possible, I wanted to ask the question.
May 4, 2018 at 13:43 comment added Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine It’s not clear to me what sort of formula you’re looking for — for general $\omega$, what kind of formula could one hope for that would be more explicit than $\int_0^T (A_t)^2 dt$? Can you give an example to illustrate what you’re looking for — i.e. a formula to “explicitly compute” some other integral associated to an object, in the sense you have in mind?
May 4, 2018 at 12:11 history edited Piero D'Ancona CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
May 3, 2018 at 22:25 history asked Beni Bogosel CC BY-SA 4.0