Skip to main content

Timeline for Surreal Numbers, Proving $x1=x$

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 4, 2018 at 18:02 vote accept Nikolai Opdan
May 4, 2018 at 18:02 vote accept Nikolai Opdan
May 4, 2018 at 18:02
Apr 29, 2018 at 17:07 comment added Noah Schweber @JoelDavidHamkins That's a fair point.
Apr 29, 2018 at 16:32 comment added Gerald Edgar For interesting reading, including adventures in proving the basic properties of the surreals, see Knuth's little book Surreal Numbers.
Apr 29, 2018 at 15:25 comment added Joel David Hamkins My opinion is that basically any serious question about the surreal numbers is fine on MathOverflow. Furthermore, I admire any student who tries to go through the development of the surreals from first principles, and MO is a good resource for such a student to get help. I once ran an intersession graduate seminar at the University of Amsterdam developing this theory from the ground up, and those students faced similar questions to this one at the beginning.
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:47 review Close votes
Apr 30, 2018 at 7:45
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:32 answer added Joel David Hamkins timeline score: 15
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:30 comment added Nikolai Opdan I understand that all the terms involving $\emptyset$ and 0 does not contribute any representatives to the product, but there are still the four terms $X_L1, X_R1, X_L1, X_R1$ which I am questioning. I can't get rid of the extra $X_R1$ on the left side and $X_L1$ on the left side.
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:25 comment added Joel David Hamkins The empty set has no elements in it, and so the terms in your expression involving $\emptyset$ do not contribute any representatives to the product $x1$.
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:19 history edited Qfwfq CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:07 review First posts
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:22
Apr 29, 2018 at 13:05 history asked Nikolai Opdan CC BY-SA 3.0