Timeline for What computer program for automorphic forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2, 2018 at 16:19 | comment | added | Antoine | I am theoretical physicist and as such use Mathematica a lot. But when I have to use modular/automorphic forms, I immediately switch to Sage. | |
Apr 28, 2018 at 7:18 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 135 characters in body
|
Apr 27, 2018 at 19:38 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Sage does, in fact, have weight 1 forms, and Petersson products of level 1 forms (both implemented by me, as it happens). But Pari/GP's implementation seems to be rather more general; I've edited my answer to include this. You are also quite correct that Hilbert mod forms are one important thing that Magma does have which neither of its competitors offer at present. | |
Apr 27, 2018 at 19:18 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 61 characters in body
|
Apr 27, 2018 at 15:24 | comment | added | Aurel | It includes weight 1 and half-integral, expansion at all cusps, petersson product etc. which I am not sure that magma or sage have. One should also note that magma has Hilbert modular forms. | |
Apr 27, 2018 at 15:18 | comment | added | Aurel | pari/gp also has classical modular forms : pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/dochtml/html | |
Apr 27, 2018 at 11:13 | history | answered | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |