Timeline for Is the strong operator topology metrizable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2018 at 13:22 | history | edited | Tomasz Kania | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2018 at 13:14 | history | edited | Tomasz Kania | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2018 at 13:08 | history | edited | Tomasz Kania | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2018 at 13:04 | comment | added | Tomasz Kania | @NikWeaver, you are completely right. The OP may want to see: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2515140/… | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 12:56 | vote | accept | ABB | ||
| Apr 26, 2018 at 16:29 | |||||
| Apr 26, 2018 at 11:51 | comment | added | Nik Weaver | But note that its restriction to the unit ball is metrizable, by $d(S,T) = \sum 2^{-n} \|(S - T)x_n\|$ where $(x_n)$ is a dense sequence in the unit ball of $X$. That's something I've used once or twice. | |
| Apr 26, 2018 at 10:45 | history | edited | Tomasz Kania | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2018 at 10:39 | history | edited | Tomasz Kania | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2018 at 10:32 | history | answered | Tomasz Kania | CC BY-SA 3.0 |