Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

added 82 characters in body
Source Link
Evgeny Goncharov
Evgeny Goncharov
  • 131
  • 1
  • 4

Contributing here for completeness. I have translated Deligne's original paper into English (it is only 35 pages) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wxVbCrm_0D4jInvG1pd1vhnI7YnvSk0S/view?usp=sharing Still, I suggest to first get acquainted with the theory of etale cohomology and the exposition of the proof in Milne and only then turn to the original paper to fill in the details.

Added: I have found certain typos but they are not crucial for the exposition.

Contributing here for completeness. I have translated Deligne's original paper into English (it is only 35 pages) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wxVbCrm_0D4jInvG1pd1vhnI7YnvSk0S/view?usp=sharing Still, I suggest to first get acquainted with the theory of etale cohomology and the exposition of the proof in Milne and only then turn to the original paper to fill in the details.

Contributing here for completeness. I have translated Deligne's original paper into English (it is only 35 pages) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wxVbCrm_0D4jInvG1pd1vhnI7YnvSk0S/view?usp=sharing Still, I suggest to first get acquainted with the theory of etale cohomology and the exposition of the proof in Milne and only then turn to the original paper to fill in the details.

Added: I have found certain typos but they are not crucial for the exposition.

edited body
Source Link
Evgeny Goncharov
Evgeny Goncharov
  • 131
  • 1
  • 4

Contributing here for completeness. I have translated Deligne's original paper into English (it is only 35 pages) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/11gyDVOVrGMPmFW5x6ziFW3lNVNhXr6YD/view?usp=sharinghttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1wxVbCrm_0D4jInvG1pd1vhnI7YnvSk0S/view?usp=sharing Still, I suggest to first get acquainted with the theory of etale cohomology and the exposition of the proof in Milne and only then turn to the original paper to fill in the details.

Contributing here for completeness. I have translated Deligne's original paper into English (it is only 35 pages) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/11gyDVOVrGMPmFW5x6ziFW3lNVNhXr6YD/view?usp=sharing Still, I suggest to first get acquainted with the theory of etale cohomology and the exposition of the proof in Milne and only then turn to the original paper to fill in the details.

Contributing here for completeness. I have translated Deligne's original paper into English (it is only 35 pages) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wxVbCrm_0D4jInvG1pd1vhnI7YnvSk0S/view?usp=sharing Still, I suggest to first get acquainted with the theory of etale cohomology and the exposition of the proof in Milne and only then turn to the original paper to fill in the details.

Post Undeleted by Evgeny Goncharov
Post Deleted by Evgeny Goncharov
Source Link
Evgeny Goncharov
Evgeny Goncharov
  • 131
  • 1
  • 4

Contributing here for completeness. I have translated Deligne's original paper into English (it is only 35 pages) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/11gyDVOVrGMPmFW5x6ziFW3lNVNhXr6YD/view?usp=sharing Still, I suggest to first get acquainted with the theory of etale cohomology and the exposition of the proof in Milne and only then turn to the original paper to fill in the details.