Timeline for hyperalgebras (positive characteristic)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 31, 2012 at 4:28 | history | edited | Binai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 107 characters in body; deleted 12 characters in body
|
Dec 2, 2011 at 16:52 | history | edited | Binai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling, fixed grammar, improved formatting
|
Dec 2, 2011 at 1:38 | history | rollback | Qiaochu Yuan |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
Dec 2, 2011 at 1:06 | history | edited | Binai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 556 characters in body
|
Dec 5, 2010 at 21:32 | vote | accept | Binai | ||
Jun 29, 2010 at 22:28 | vote | accept | Binai | ||
Jun 29, 2010 at 22:28 | |||||
Jun 29, 2010 at 13:50 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | The term "hyperalgebra" usually applies to a different setting than this one, which makes the initial question unclear. It's helpful to indicate the background sources you are starting with. | |
Jun 29, 2010 at 11:23 | answer | added | Tiago | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 29, 2010 at 6:39 | history | edited | Robin Chapman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
cured tex problems
|
Jun 29, 2010 at 6:36 | history | edited | Binai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
Jun 29, 2010 at 2:08 | history | edited | Binai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 489 characters in body
|
Jun 29, 2010 at 1:35 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | Please, explain the context/starting point of your calculation. Aren't relations between $x_\alpha^{(n)}$ and $x_\beta^{(m)}$ part of the algebra structure? | |
Jun 29, 2010 at 0:48 | history | asked | Binai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |