Timeline for How does this definition define a größencharakter?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2018 at 23:38 | vote | accept | Alex Saad | ||
| Apr 18, 2018 at 17:06 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 18, 2018 at 17:03 | answer | added | GH from MO | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 18, 2018 at 16:11 | history | migrated | from math.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Apr 11, 2018 at 10:09 | comment | added | Alex Saad | @dan_fulea unfortunately not. I am not asking for an explanation of the equivalence of both definitions (although the article does not completely explain this), but rather how Zagier's "definition" fits into either of the established ones. For example, what are the modulus $\mathfrak{m}$ and the characters $\chi_f$, $\chi_\infty$ in this situation? | |
| Apr 10, 2018 at 19:34 | comment | added | dan_fulea | Does the following link answer the question completely? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Mar 26, 2018 at 23:07 | comment | added | Alex Saad | @DavidR. You’re quite right, I have probably anglicised the word incorrectly! Indeed the original German should be “größencharakter”, and I think when anglicised people sometimes write “grossencharacter”. But perhaps I shouldn’t have included the umlaut as well in this case? | |
| Mar 23, 2018 at 18:02 | comment | added | David R. | I just want to bring up a minor detail of terminology. Shouldn't "grössencharacter" be "Größencharakter" with plural "Größencharaktern"? | |
| Mar 23, 2018 at 13:26 | history | asked | Alex Saad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |