Timeline for Bredon homology defined using singular chains
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2023 at 8:38 | vote | accept | Igor Sikora | ||
| Mar 17, 2023 at 8:38 | |||||
| May 17, 2018 at 17:39 | vote | accept | Igor Sikora | ||
| May 17, 2018 at 17:39 | |||||
| Apr 19, 2018 at 16:53 | answer | added | Igor Sikora | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 18, 2018 at 14:54 | comment | added | Stefan Behrens | Well, they should agree on finite complexes, since they both satisfy the relevant Eilenberg-Steenrod type axioms. But as I said, I'm not an expert on these matters. Sorry. | |
| Apr 18, 2018 at 14:37 | comment | added | Igor Sikora | Yes, I saw this paper. I am simply not sure, whether his construction (which by uniqueness of ordinary cohomology theories should be the same as Bredon, given coefficient system) is equivalent to just replacing cellular chains in the Bredon's construction with singular chains. | |
| Apr 18, 2018 at 14:31 | comment | added | Stefan Behrens | It sounds like Illman's "Equivariant singular homology and cohomology I" (Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1975), issue 2, no. 156) is exactly what you're looking for. I can't say anything about the possible difference in the theories, though. | |
| Apr 18, 2018 at 13:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 18, 2018 at 13:56 | |||||
| Apr 18, 2018 at 13:52 | history | asked | Igor Sikora | CC BY-SA 3.0 |