Skip to main content
deleted 7 characters in body
Source Link
asv
  • 21.8k
  • 6
  • 54
  • 121

EDIT. I am trying to read the article “Supersymmetry and Morse theory” by E. Witten (JDG 17 (1982)). This well known article applies some tools developed by physicists (e.g. path integrals) to topology of manifolds.

I am a mathematician, but I am familiar with some necessary physical ideas, although probably on more elementary level than necessary to understand the paper. To be more specific, I cannot understand the computation of matrix elements of the (twisted) de Rham differential $d_t$ on p. 672-673. The exposition there is too concise for me.

Is there a more detailed exposition of Witten’s paper today? However I am NOT lookingmathematical rigor is not so important for a mathematically more rigorous expositionme. I would like to understand the physicists tools and ideas.

I am trying to read the article “Supersymmetry and Morse theory” by E. Witten (JDG 17 (1982)). This well known article applies some tools developed by physicists (e.g. path integrals) to topology of manifolds.

I am a mathematician, but I am familiar with some necessary physical ideas, although probably on more elementary level than necessary to understand the paper. To be more specific, I cannot understand the computation of matrix elements of the (twisted) de Rham differential $d_t$ on p. 672-673. The exposition there is too concise for me.

Is there a more detailed exposition of Witten’s paper today? However I am NOT looking for a mathematically more rigorous exposition. I would like to understand the physicists tools and ideas.

EDIT. I am trying to read the article “Supersymmetry and Morse theory” by E. Witten (JDG 17 (1982)). This well known article applies some tools developed by physicists (e.g. path integrals) to topology of manifolds.

I am a mathematician, but I am familiar with some necessary physical ideas, although probably on more elementary level than necessary to understand the paper. To be more specific, I cannot understand the computation of matrix elements of the (twisted) de Rham differential $d_t$ on p. 672-673. The exposition there is too concise for me.

Is there a more detailed exposition of Witten’s paper today? However mathematical rigor is not so important for me. I would like to understand the physicists tools and ideas.

Source Link
asv
  • 21.8k
  • 6
  • 54
  • 121

Question on Witten’s paper “Supersymmetry and Morse theory”

I am trying to read the article “Supersymmetry and Morse theory” by E. Witten (JDG 17 (1982)). This well known article applies some tools developed by physicists (e.g. path integrals) to topology of manifolds.

I am a mathematician, but I am familiar with some necessary physical ideas, although probably on more elementary level than necessary to understand the paper. To be more specific, I cannot understand the computation of matrix elements of the (twisted) de Rham differential $d_t$ on p. 672-673. The exposition there is too concise for me.

Is there a more detailed exposition of Witten’s paper today? However I am NOT looking for a mathematically more rigorous exposition. I would like to understand the physicists tools and ideas.