Timeline for Separation property for non-injective flows
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 3, 2020 at 13:29 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags, emphasized question
|
Apr 11, 2018 at 18:35 | answer | added | Lénaïc Chizat | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 10, 2018 at 22:38 | history | edited | Lénaïc Chizat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed to domain to $\mathbb{R}^d$ for simplicity and consistency.
|
Apr 10, 2018 at 21:55 | comment | added | Lénaïc Chizat | Oh I was imprecise, I indeed mean the second case, let me update my question. Thank you. | |
Apr 10, 2018 at 20:45 | comment | added | user539887 | It is not clear to me what you understand by $\partial A$. Is this the boundary in the topology of $\mathbb{R}^d$, or in the relative topology of $\Omega$? I would rather think the latter: $\Omega$ is our "universe". Take $A = \Omega = (-1, 1) \subset \mathbb{R}$ and $X_t(x) = e^{-t}x$. $\partial(X_1(A)) = \{ -e^{-1}, e^{-1} \}$, whereas $X_1(\partial A) = \emptyset$. And if you understand by $\partial A$ its boundary in the topology of the ambient space $\mathbb{R}^d$, the semiflow should be defined on the closure of $\Omega$. | |
Apr 10, 2018 at 19:39 | review | First posts | |||
Apr 10, 2018 at 19:42 | |||||
Apr 10, 2018 at 19:35 | history | asked | Lénaïc Chizat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |