Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S May 14, 2021 at 5:02 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S May 14, 2021 at 5:02 history notice removed CommunityBot
May 9, 2021 at 1:18 comment added Tomita Assuming $x=1.$ According to Silverman's comment, we get three elliptic curves as follows. $ y=3w \implies Y^2=X^3-8$ with integral points=$(2,0)$, $ y=3w+1\implies Y^2=X^3-72$ with integral points=$(6,\pm12)$, $ y=3w+2\implies Y^2=X^3-648$ with integral points=$(9,\pm 9), (18,\pm 72), (22,\pm 100), (54,\pm 396), (97,\pm 955), (1809,\pm 76941).$
May 8, 2021 at 21:40 answer added Derivative timeline score: 4
May 6, 2021 at 6:22 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
added tag, fixed typo, formatting
S May 6, 2021 at 3:48 history bounty started math110
S May 6, 2021 at 3:48 history notice added math110 Authoritative reference needed
S Nov 21, 2019 at 9:00 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Nov 21, 2019 at 9:00 history notice removed CommunityBot
S Nov 13, 2019 at 7:20 history bounty started math110
S Nov 13, 2019 at 7:20 history notice added math110 Authoritative reference needed
Aug 13, 2018 at 18:55 comment added Kieren MacMillan Is the [possible] connection to Fermat’s “elliptic curve” (Y^2+4=X^3) coincidental?
S Apr 19, 2018 at 4:29 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Apr 19, 2018 at 4:29 history notice removed CommunityBot
Apr 17, 2018 at 1:52 comment added j.c. Ah, I was assuming from @GerhardPaseman's comment that there was an easy proof that I was missing...
Apr 16, 2018 at 22:08 comment added Noam D. Elkies Thanks, but that's still just the $x=1$ case so it wouldn't qualify as an answer to the bounty question.
Apr 16, 2018 at 19:49 comment added j.c. Following the hint of @NoamD.Elkies , I found a 1958 paper of CY Lee "Some properties of nonbinary error-correcting codes" ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1057446 which attributes the solution of $2z^2+1=3^y$ to T. Nagell. Since it is hard to find, I have uploaded a copy of Nagell's 1923 paper "Sur l'impossibilité de quelques equations à deux indéterminées" here dropbox.com/s/69iuu00ux30dclu/nagell1923.pdf?dl=0 (this dropbox link is not really permanent, so rehosting would be appreciated). Perhaps someone more expert than me could write an answer?
Apr 11, 2018 at 2:49 comment added Noam D. Elkies The Diophantine equation $2z^2+1 = 3^y$ that appears for $x=1$ has already been studied: $2z^2+1 = 4{z \choose 2} + 2z + 1$ is the volume of a radius-2 ball in ternary Hamming space ${\bf F}_3^z$, so $2z^2+1 = 3^y$ is a necessary condition for the existence of a perfect 2-error-correcting ternary code in that space. It is known that $z=1,2,11$ are the only solutions, each corresponding to a code (trivial codes for $z=1$ and $2$, and the ternary Golay code for $z=11$).
S Apr 11, 2018 at 2:30 history bounty started math110
S Apr 11, 2018 at 2:30 history notice added math110 Authoritative reference needed
Apr 1, 2018 at 18:14 comment added Igor Rivin Actually, the argument in the linked-to reference goes through essentially line by line, with nary an elliptic curve.
Apr 1, 2018 at 12:26 comment added Joe Silverman And after you show that $x=1$, as Gerhard suggests, you can take the three cases $y=3w$, $y=3w+1$, and $y=3w+2$, which reduces the problem to finding the integer points on three fairly standard elliptic curves.
Apr 1, 2018 at 11:49 history edited math110 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Apr 1, 2018 at 5:33 comment added Gerhard Paseman Can you show that x has to be one? Gerhard "Try It. It's Not Hard" Paseman, 2018.03.31.
Apr 1, 2018 at 4:56 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
minor typos
Apr 1, 2018 at 4:47 history asked math110 CC BY-SA 3.0