Skip to main content
added 246 characters in body
Source Link
R W
  • 17k
  • 3
  • 37
  • 74

Not at all. Take $f(x)=x^2$ on the unit interval. For examples of uniquely ergodic homeomorphisms of the Cantor set see The prevalence of uniquely ergodic systems by Jewett. A simple explicit example is provided by the boundary action of any hyperbolic automorphism of a homogeneous tree (attach a binary tree to each integer and look at the action of the integer shift on the space of ends of the whole construction).

Not at all. Take $f(x)=x^2$ on the unit interval. For examples of uniquely ergodic homeomorphisms of the Cantor set see The prevalence of uniquely ergodic systems by Jewett.

Not at all. Take $f(x)=x^2$ on the unit interval. For examples of uniquely ergodic homeomorphisms of the Cantor set see The prevalence of uniquely ergodic systems by Jewett. A simple explicit example is provided by the boundary action of any hyperbolic automorphism of a homogeneous tree (attach a binary tree to each integer and look at the action of the integer shift on the space of ends of the whole construction).

added 197 characters in body
Source Link
R W
  • 17k
  • 3
  • 37
  • 74

Not at all. Take $f(x)=x^2$ on the unit interval. For examples of uniquely ergodic homeomorphisms of the Cantor set see The prevalence of uniquely ergodic systems by Jewett.

Not at all. Take $f(x)=x^2$ on the unit interval.

Not at all. Take $f(x)=x^2$ on the unit interval. For examples of uniquely ergodic homeomorphisms of the Cantor set see The prevalence of uniquely ergodic systems by Jewett.

Source Link
R W
  • 17k
  • 3
  • 37
  • 74

Not at all. Take $f(x)=x^2$ on the unit interval.