Timeline for Formally real fields with unique non-Archimedean ordering
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2018 at 11:34 | answer | added | user05811 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 16:56 | answer | added | Emil Jeřábek | timeline score: 6 | |
| S Mar 21, 2018 at 15:53 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
automorphisms of K(x)
|
| Mar 21, 2018 at 11:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 21, 2018 at 15:53 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2018 at 10:32 | comment | added | Denis Nardin | @PeterHeinig Ugh, this means I've been mispronouncing them for the last couple of years... Thanks! | |
| Mar 20, 2018 at 10:24 | comment | added | Peter Heinig | (Linguistic note @DenisNardin: the correct spelling is Puiseux series.) | |
| S Mar 20, 2018 at 10:22 | history | suggested | M. Dus |
added more tags
|
|
| Mar 20, 2018 at 10:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 22, 2018 at 13:30 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2018 at 10:05 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Mar 20, 2018 at 10:25 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:54 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 20, 2018 at 10:22 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:53 | comment | added | Denis Nardin | Every real closed field has a unique ordering (the positive elements are precisely the squares). Just pick a non-archimedean one (e.g. Puiseaux series over $\mathbb{R}$). | |
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:52 | history | edited | Loïc Teyssier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed the "title"
|
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:51 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | I guess the confusion is that the box named "Title" does not refer to your professional title, but to the subject of your posting. | |
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:58 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:50 | comment | added | M. Dus | You should have a more explicit title and maybe add a bit of context to your question. | |
| Mar 20, 2018 at 9:46 | history | asked | JOSE MANUEL GAMBOA MUTUBERRIA | CC BY-SA 3.0 |