Timeline for Dirichlet series associated with polynomials
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2018 at 9:44 | comment | added | Henri Cohen | If I remember correctly, Pierrette Cassou-Nogues has several papers on the subject. | |
Mar 19, 2018 at 22:19 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Mar 19, 2018 at 22:01 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Mar 19, 2018 at 21:07 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Mar 19, 2018 at 21:00 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 626 characters in body
|
Mar 19, 2018 at 20:28 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
Mar 19, 2018 at 20:26 | comment | added | user39115 | You are right, I corrected the question. This is part of the problem... I do not know if it extends meromorphically to the left of 1/k... It should be always the case I believe. | |
Mar 19, 2018 at 20:20 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 72 characters in body
|
Mar 17, 2018 at 18:50 | comment | added | A Stasinski | For the first question to make sense, you need to know that $Z(s)$ extends meromorphically to the left of $1/k$. How do you know this? When all $P_i$s are equal, it is known, but in general? | |
Mar 16, 2018 at 19:49 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Mar 16, 2018 at 19:48 | comment | added | user39115 | I intended the absolute value. If they are not uniformly bounded the result should fail. | |
Mar 16, 2018 at 19:34 | comment | added | GH from MO | What is $\|\delta_j^i\|$, i.e. what is the symbol $\|\cdot\|$? | |
Mar 16, 2018 at 18:25 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Mar 16, 2018 at 18:16 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
Mar 16, 2018 at 18:14 | comment | added | Greg Martin | "holomorphic for Re$(s) > 1/k$ with possible poles at $1,0,-1,\dots$" doesn't make sense: if a pole at $s=1$ is possible then it could be meromorphic but not holomorphic; and talking about poles at $0,-1,\dots$ isn't reasonable if the function isn't even defined there. Please clarify. | |
Mar 16, 2018 at 17:58 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Mar 16, 2018 at 17:04 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
Mar 16, 2018 at 16:13 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Mar 16, 2018 at 16:04 | history | edited | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Mar 16, 2018 at 15:53 | history | asked | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |