Timeline for A "strong" Galois-Tukey connection between orders with suborders
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2018 at 18:14 | vote | accept | Goldstern | ||
| Mar 14, 2018 at 13:45 | history | edited | Goldstern | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting (spacing). Also removed "signature", as Peter probably did not know that the signature is added automatically
|
| Mar 14, 2018 at 13:38 | comment | added | Goldstern | I am not interested in the case when $Q_0$ and $P_0$ are dominating in $P$; $Q$ respectively. But if $P\not= P_0$, one can extend $\varphi^-$ to all of $Q$ be mapping $Q\setminus Q_0$ into $P\setminus P_0$, and still keep the essential implication $\varphi^-(q) \le p \Rightarrow \dots$, as elements of $P\setminus P_0$ will not appear on the left side of the new (restricted) relation $\le$. | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 21:31 | comment | added | Goldstern | Hi, welcome to mathoverflow! | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 21:18 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 13, 2018 at 21:52 | |||||
| Mar 13, 2018 at 21:18 | history | answered | Peter Vojtas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |