Skip to main content
added 16 characters in body
Source Link
Qfwfq
  • 23.3k
  • 14
  • 122
  • 225

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero which its commutation relations are:

[J_m,J_n]=(m-n)J_m+n,$$[J_m,J_n]=(m-n)J_{m+n},$$

[J_m,P_n]=(m-n)P_m+n,$$[J_m,P_n]=(m-n)P_{m+n},$$

[P_m,P_n]=0.$$[P_m,P_n]=0.$$

In this connection, I infinitesimally deform the last commutator(the ideal of algebra) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra.The first commutator is a subalgebra which is known as Witt algebra and will remain rigid by deformation procedure. But I am not sure about the second commutator which can be deformed or not. This problem has connection with this question: Is the rigid Lie algebra I mentioned above "unique" and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero which its commutation relations are:

[J_m,J_n]=(m-n)J_m+n,

[J_m,P_n]=(m-n)P_m+n,

[P_m,P_n]=0.

In this connection, I infinitesimally deform the last commutator(the ideal of algebra) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra.The first commutator is a subalgebra which is known as Witt algebra and will remain rigid by deformation procedure. But I am not sure about the second commutator which can be deformed or not. This problem has connection with this question: Is the rigid Lie algebra I mentioned above "unique" and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero which its commutation relations are:

$$[J_m,J_n]=(m-n)J_{m+n},$$

$$[J_m,P_n]=(m-n)P_{m+n},$$

$$[P_m,P_n]=0.$$

In this connection, I infinitesimally deform the last commutator(the ideal of algebra) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra.The first commutator is a subalgebra which is known as Witt algebra and will remain rigid by deformation procedure. But I am not sure about the second commutator which can be deformed or not. This problem has connection with this question: Is the rigid Lie algebra I mentioned above "unique" and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

added 327 characters in body
Source Link

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero which its commutation relations are:

[J_m,J_n]=(m-n)J_m+n,

[J_m,P_n]=(m-n)P_m+n,

[P_m,P_n]=0. 

In this connection, I infinitesimally deform one of commutation relations the last commutator(Lie bracketsthe ideal of algebra) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra (Witt Lie algebra).The questionfirst commutator is a subalgebra which is known as Witt algebra and will remain rigid by deformation procedure. But I am not sure about the second commutator which can be deformed or not. This problem has connection with this question: Is thisthe rigid Lie algebra uniqueI mentioned above "unique" and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero. In this connection, I infinitesimally deform one of commutation relations (Lie brackets) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra (Witt Lie algebra).The question is: Is this rigid Lie algebra unique and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero which its commutation relations are:

[J_m,J_n]=(m-n)J_m+n,

[J_m,P_n]=(m-n)P_m+n,

[P_m,P_n]=0. 

In this connection, I infinitesimally deform the last commutator(the ideal of algebra) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra.The first commutator is a subalgebra which is known as Witt algebra and will remain rigid by deformation procedure. But I am not sure about the second commutator which can be deformed or not. This problem has connection with this question: Is the rigid Lie algebra I mentioned above "unique" and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

added 220 characters in body
Source Link

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero. In this connection, I infinitesimally deform one of commutation relations (Lie brackets) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra (Witt Lie algebra).The question is: ThisIs this rigid Lie algebra is unique and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

I am studying deformation and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras. In this connection, I deform one of commutation relations (Lie brackets) by adding some terms and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra.The question is: This rigid Lie algebra is unique and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

I am studying deformation (as it is introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0611793.pdf or http://web.cs.elte.hu/~fialowsk/pubs-af/condefnew2.pdf) and rigidity of some infinite dimensional Lie algebras which are defined on field with characteristic zero. In this connection, I infinitesimally deform one of commutation relations (Lie brackets) by adding some terms in its RHS and reach to an infinite dimensional rigid Lie algebra (Witt Lie algebra).The question is: Is this rigid Lie algebra unique and independent of how I deform the initial Lie algebra? In fact, if I started with other commutation relations would I reach to another rigid Lie algebra? Is there any theorem about "uniqueness" of rigid Lie algebra which is derived in deformation procedure?

Source Link
Loading