Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Sep 25, 2010 at 21:38 answer added Peter Arndt timeline score: 9
Jun 29, 2010 at 8:09 answer added Theo Johnson-Freyd timeline score: 6
Jun 29, 2010 at 6:58 comment added Theo Johnson-Freyd @Boyarsky: Yes, Tannaka works much more generally. See the paper by Joyal and Street (they have many together: look for ones with "Tannaka" in the title).
Jun 26, 2010 at 4:02 answer added Ryan Reich timeline score: 6
Jun 25, 2010 at 13:04 history edited Akhil Mathew CC BY-SA 2.5
added 35 characters in body
Jun 25, 2010 at 13:03 comment added Akhil Mathew Well, I had restricted myself to the finite-dimensional hom-space case. I wasn't really clear about it in the question, so I'll add it.
Jun 25, 2010 at 2:15 comment added Boyarsky Hopf algebra axioms are only dualizable (in the finite-dimesional case) when the group object is commutative, unless one wants to give up commutativity on both sides (and then it doesn't correspond to a finite group scheme, so is Tannaka nonsense applicable?)
Jun 25, 2010 at 0:53 comment added Akhil Mathew That sounds reasonable (I had forgotten that Hopf algebras had dualizable axioms) but I'll have to convince myself.
Jun 25, 2010 at 0:36 vote accept Akhil Mathew
Jun 25, 2010 at 0:35 answer added Greg Stevenson timeline score: 25
Jun 25, 2010 at 0:23 comment added Qiaochu Yuan The obvious guess for the second question is the dual, at least when H is finite-dimensional. Have you checked this e.g. for H = C[G], G a finite group?
Jun 24, 2010 at 23:48 history asked Akhil Mathew CC BY-SA 2.5