Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 1, 2018 at 21:17 comment added Simon Henry It is indeed an existence statement as asked, But that does not qualifies as something where the proof would become so long that it is not 'human readable' (It only takes 2 pages in the end)
Mar 1, 2018 at 21:16 comment added Simon Henry I did encounter some example of things that where true constructively but whose proof was considerably harder than the classical one. One of them was the the following: let G be a compact localic group acting on a decidable set X. Then $X$ can be covered by finite subset stable under the action of $G$. Classically one easily show that the orbit of any point is a finite $G$ stable subset. but constructively it fails if we do not assume $G$ to be locally positive (Overt). I gave a completely different constructive proof of it in arxiv.org/abs/1505.04987. (prop 4.3 and lemma 4.2 and 4.1).
Mar 1, 2018 at 20:34 answer added Aaron Meyerowitz timeline score: 2
Mar 1, 2018 at 19:14 answer added Corey Bacal Switzer timeline score: 1
Mar 1, 2018 at 13:15 comment added Ingo Blechschmidt Very interesting question. In my personal experience in algebra, a classically provable and interesting statement is either also constructively provable, with a proof of similar length, or there's an obvious reason for why there is no hope that a constructive proof exists. I'm speaking about informal proofs here, not proofs in some formal system. I'm looking forward to making a new experience and adapting my intuition!
Mar 1, 2018 at 11:40 answer added Alex Gavrilov timeline score: 6
Mar 1, 2018 at 0:20 history edited Ganon CC BY-SA 3.0
added 788 characters in body
Feb 28, 2018 at 20:43 answer added Joel David Hamkins timeline score: 12
Feb 28, 2018 at 18:00 history asked Ganon CC BY-SA 3.0