Timeline for Does $\diamondsuit(\kappa)$ provably hold at Woodins or inaccessible Jónssons $\kappa$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Mar 23, 2018 at 15:54 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Mar 23, 2018 at 15:54 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Mar 19, 2018 at 8:54 | answer | added | Not Mike | timeline score: 2 | |
S Mar 15, 2018 at 14:45 | history | bounty started | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | ||
S Mar 15, 2018 at 14:45 | history | notice added | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | Draw attention | |
Feb 25, 2018 at 12:27 | vote | accept | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | ||
Feb 25, 2018 at 22:06 | |||||
Feb 14, 2018 at 9:13 | answer | added | Yair Hayut | timeline score: 13 | |
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:58 | history | edited | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed title
|
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:57 | comment | added | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | Yes, but since Woodins aren't weakly compact in general and whether Jonssons are is still open, the 'weakly compact diamond programme' probably wouldn't be able to give an answer to my question. My question is perhaps then if diamond provably holds for Woodins and inaccessible Jonssons. I'll change the title. | |
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:44 | comment | added | Mohammad Golshani | See Failure of diamond at large cardinals | |
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:43 | comment | added | Mohammad Golshani | Diamond hold at them in known core models. The question of whether diamond can fail at a weakly compact cardinal is a major open question. | |
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:39 | comment | added | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | But that's basically the same question, no? | |
Feb 12, 2018 at 23:01 | comment | added | Andrés E. Caicedo | The issue is not with diamond holding but rather with its failure. | |
Feb 12, 2018 at 22:46 | history | edited | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Feb 12, 2018 at 22:30 | history | asked | Dan Saattrup Nielsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |