Timeline for Sheaf-theoretic Grothendieck groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 19, 2018 at 4:38 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 19, 2018 at 4:38 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 11, 2018 at 2:56 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 11, 2018 at 2:56 | history | notice added | user113393 | Draw attention | |
| Feb 10, 2018 at 23:45 | history | edited | user113393 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 82 characters in body
|
| Feb 10, 2018 at 23:37 | history | edited | user113393 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 190 characters in body
|
| Feb 10, 2018 at 23:34 | comment | added | user113393 | Yes, fair enough. It may well be possible there's a better presentation, though. Or one may try to verify Artin's axioms, which I haven't tried yet, to settle the general question. | |
| Feb 10, 2018 at 23:30 | comment | added | Marc Hoyois | The fiber of $R\to M\times_SM$ over $(0,0)$ is $M$, so it's not an étale equivalence relation when $M$ is not étale over $S$. | |
| Feb 10, 2018 at 23:20 | history | edited | user113393 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1248 characters in body
|
| Feb 10, 2018 at 21:38 | history | edited | user113393 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2018 at 3:11 | history | edited | user113393 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 9, 2018 at 2:55 | history | asked | user113393 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |