Skip to main content
Fixed link
Source Link
David Roberts
  • 35.4k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

According to https Michael Hopkins, Mark Hovey, Spin cobordism determines real K-theory, Mathematische Zeitschrift 210.1 (1992)://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/HopkinsHoveyCobordismK.pdf "Michael Hopkins, Mark Hovey, Spin cobordism determines real K-theory, Mathematische Zeitschrift 210.1 (1992): 181-196" 181-196, 4th page of the pdf file, the Atiyah-Bott-Shapiro Orientation is just one of the Anderson-Brown-Peterson Splitting map $\pi ^0$. Now, according to the paper by Anderson-Brown-Peterson, the discussion between Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.4, this map is just the projection to the "bottom summand" $BO\langle 0 \rangle $.

According to https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/HopkinsHoveyCobordismK.pdf "Michael Hopkins, Mark Hovey, Spin cobordism determines real K-theory, Mathematische Zeitschrift 210.1 (1992): 181-196", 4th page of the pdf file, the Atiyah-Bott-Shapiro Orientation is just one of the Anderson-Brown-Peterson Splitting map $\pi ^0$. Now, according to the paper by Anderson-Brown-Peterson, the discussion between Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.4, this map is just the projection to the "bottom summand" $BO\langle 0 \rangle $.

According to Michael Hopkins, Mark Hovey, Spin cobordism determines real K-theory, Mathematische Zeitschrift 210.1 (1992): 181-196, 4th page of the pdf file, the Atiyah-Bott-Shapiro Orientation is just one of the Anderson-Brown-Peterson Splitting map $\pi ^0$. Now, according to the paper by Anderson-Brown-Peterson, the discussion between Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.4, this map is just the projection to the "bottom summand" $BO\langle 0 \rangle $.

Source Link
user43326
  • 3.1k
  • 17
  • 25

According to https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/HopkinsHoveyCobordismK.pdf "Michael Hopkins, Mark Hovey, Spin cobordism determines real K-theory, Mathematische Zeitschrift 210.1 (1992): 181-196", 4th page of the pdf file, the Atiyah-Bott-Shapiro Orientation is just one of the Anderson-Brown-Peterson Splitting map $\pi ^0$. Now, according to the paper by Anderson-Brown-Peterson, the discussion between Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.4, this map is just the projection to the "bottom summand" $BO\langle 0 \rangle $.