Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 3, 2018 at 21:17 comment added Max Alekseyev @mehdibaghalaghdam: Anyway, reduction proposed by Gerhard Paseman works better here. I've shown mine just out of curiosity.
Feb 3, 2018 at 21:08 comment added Max Alekseyev @mehdibaghalaghdam: $(u^2,u^2,u)$ is not the only solution to $X^2+Y^2=2Z^4$. E.g., $((u^2+1)(u^2+2u-1),(u^2+1)(u^2-2u-1),u^2+1)$ is another one.
Feb 3, 2018 at 20:37 comment added mehdi baghalaghdam Yes. This is right. thank you very much for your comments. we know that the soution of the equation x^2+y^2=2z^4 is (u^2,u^2,u). Then we get (2r^2p^2-s^2q^2=2s^2p^2-s^2q^2 , i.e., r=s or t=1 which leads to the trivial solution t=r/s=1. Then the case 2,4 has only trivial solution.
Feb 3, 2018 at 19:12 comment added Max Alekseyev @mehdibaghalaghdam: Indeed, I lost a couple of coefficients. The correct equation is $$(2r^2p^2 - s^2q^2)^2 + (2s^2p^2-s^2q^2)^2 = 2(sq)^4.$$
Feb 3, 2018 at 11:02 vote accept mehdi baghalaghdam
Feb 3, 2018 at 11:02
Feb 3, 2018 at 9:55 comment added mehdi baghalaghdam Dear Alekseyev ; very thanks, note that by letting x=p/q, t=r/s in the equation, we get the relation $p^2s^4+p^2r^4-q^2s^4-q^2s^2r^2=0$ which is not equivalent with $p^2s^4+p^2r^4-2r^2s^2q^2-2s^4q^2=0$.(this is obtained after some simplification in the above relation.) !! Am I saying right?
Feb 2, 2018 at 18:33 comment added mehdi baghalaghdam thanks, but t=0,1,-1 are trivial solution.
Feb 2, 2018 at 16:48 comment added LSpice Sorry, I don't know what I was thinking. Clearly $t = 1$ does indeed give a solution.
Feb 2, 2018 at 16:07 comment added mehdi baghalaghdam thank you very much for your valuable comments. I think that there exist integers n,m such that the equation has nontrivial solutions. What do you think about this?
Feb 1, 2018 at 23:52 comment added Gerhard Paseman Actually "gives" instead of "is". But I will leave it as is. Gerhard "Solutions Can Also Be Indirect" Paseman, 2018.02.01.
Feb 1, 2018 at 23:32 comment added LSpice $x = 1$ instead of $t = 1$, I guess.
Feb 1, 2018 at 22:51 history answered Gerhard Paseman CC BY-SA 3.0