Skip to main content
add a missing step
Source Link

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$ (here we use the fact that $G^A$ is amenable being a quotient of an amenable group). The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

Now on to the finite index-set case. Suppose we have amenable groups $G_1,...,G_n$ with invariant measures $\mu_1,...,\mu_n$. There is a f.a. measure on $G=\prod_i G_i$ satisfying the independence condition (e.g., a measure concentrated at a single point).

Suppose we have a f.a. measure on $G$ that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_k$ with $G_i$ considered as acting on the $i$th factor of $G$. Let $\mu'(A)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\, d\mu_i(g)$. This is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_{k+1}$.

Moreover $\mu'$ satisfies the independence condition. Suppose $A$ and $B$ depend on different sets of coordinates, and without loss of generality suppose $B$ does not depend on the $(k+1)$st coordinate. Then $\mu'(A\cap B)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\mu(B)\, d\mu_i(g)=\mu'(A)\mu(B)=\mu'(A)\mu'(B)$, since $gB=B$ for $g\in G_{k+1}$.

Iterating we get a measure that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under all of $G_1,...,G_n$.

[I realized that my original proof in the finite case didn't work, and I modified it along the lines of a suggestion in Uri Bader's comment.]

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$. The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

Now on to the finite index-set case. Suppose we have amenable groups $G_1,...,G_n$ with invariant measures $\mu_1,...,\mu_n$. There is a f.a. measure on $G=\prod_i G_i$ satisfying the independence condition (e.g., a measure concentrated at a single point).

Suppose we have a f.a. measure on $G$ that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_k$ with $G_i$ considered as acting on the $i$th factor of $G$. Let $\mu'(A)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\, d\mu_i(g)$. This is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_{k+1}$.

Moreover $\mu'$ satisfies the independence condition. Suppose $A$ and $B$ depend on different sets of coordinates, and without loss of generality suppose $B$ does not depend on the $(k+1)$st coordinate. Then $\mu'(A\cap B)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\mu(B)\, d\mu_i(g)=\mu'(A)\mu(B)=\mu'(A)\mu'(B)$, since $gB=B$ for $g\in G_{k+1}$.

Iterating we get a measure that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under all of $G_1,...,G_n$.

[I realized that my original proof in the finite case didn't work, and I modified it along the lines of a suggestion in Uri Bader's comment.]

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$ (here we use the fact that $G^A$ is amenable being a quotient of an amenable group). The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

Now on to the finite index-set case. Suppose we have amenable groups $G_1,...,G_n$ with invariant measures $\mu_1,...,\mu_n$. There is a f.a. measure on $G=\prod_i G_i$ satisfying the independence condition (e.g., a measure concentrated at a single point).

Suppose we have a f.a. measure on $G$ that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_k$ with $G_i$ considered as acting on the $i$th factor of $G$. Let $\mu'(A)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\, d\mu_i(g)$. This is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_{k+1}$.

Moreover $\mu'$ satisfies the independence condition. Suppose $A$ and $B$ depend on different sets of coordinates, and without loss of generality suppose $B$ does not depend on the $(k+1)$st coordinate. Then $\mu'(A\cap B)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\mu(B)\, d\mu_i(g)=\mu'(A)\mu(B)=\mu'(A)\mu'(B)$, since $gB=B$ for $g\in G_{k+1}$.

Iterating we get a measure that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under all of $G_1,...,G_n$.

[I realized that my original proof in the finite case didn't work, and I modified it along the lines of a suggestion in Uri Bader's comment.]

fixed proof
Source Link

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$. The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

TheNow on to the finite index-set case follows by iterating:

Lemma: If $G_1$ and $G_2$ are. Suppose we have amenable groups $G_1,...,G_n$ with finitely additive invariant measures $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, then there$\mu_1,...,\mu_n$. There is   a f.a finitely additive invariant. measure $\mu$ on their direct product such that $\mu(A\times B)=\mu_1(A)\mu_2(B)$$G=\prod_i G_i$ satisfying the independence condition (e.g., a measure concentrated at a single point).

Proof of Lemma: Let $\mu(U) = \int_{G_2} \mu_1 ( \{ x_2 : (x_1,x_2) \in U \} ) d\mu_2(x_2)$. Integrals against Suppose we have a f.a. measures are additive someasure on $\mu$$G$ that satisfies the independence condition and is a finvariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_k$ with $G_i$ considered as acting on the $i$th factor of $G$.a Let $\mu'(A)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\, d\mu_i(g)$. measureThis is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_{k+1}$.

Moreover $\mu'$ satisfies the independence condition. Suppose $A$ and $B$ depend on different sets of coordinates, and invariancewithout loss of generality suppose $B$ does not depend on the $(k+1)$st coordinate. Then $\mu'(A\cap B)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\mu(B)\, d\mu_i(g)=\mu'(A)\mu(B)=\mu'(A)\mu'(B)$, since $gB=B$ for $g\in G_{k+1}$.

Iterating we get a measure that satisfies the independence condition and is obviousinvariant under all of $G_1,...,G_n$.

[I realized that my original proof in the finite case didn't work, and I modified it along the lines of a suggestion in Uri Bader's comment.]

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$. The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

The finite index-set case follows by iterating:

Lemma: If $G_1$ and $G_2$ are groups with finitely additive invariant measures $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, then there is  a finitely additive invariant measure $\mu$ on their direct product such that $\mu(A\times B)=\mu_1(A)\mu_2(B)$.

Proof of Lemma: Let $\mu(U) = \int_{G_2} \mu_1 ( \{ x_2 : (x_1,x_2) \in U \} ) d\mu_2(x_2)$. Integrals against f.a. measures are additive so $\mu$ is a f.a. measure, and invariance is obvious.

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$. The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

Now on to the finite index-set case. Suppose we have amenable groups $G_1,...,G_n$ with invariant measures $\mu_1,...,\mu_n$. There is a f.a. measure on $G=\prod_i G_i$ satisfying the independence condition (e.g., a measure concentrated at a single point).

Suppose we have a f.a. measure on $G$ that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_k$ with $G_i$ considered as acting on the $i$th factor of $G$. Let $\mu'(A)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\, d\mu_i(g)$. This is invariant under the actions of $G_1,...,G_{k+1}$.

Moreover $\mu'$ satisfies the independence condition. Suppose $A$ and $B$ depend on different sets of coordinates, and without loss of generality suppose $B$ does not depend on the $(k+1)$st coordinate. Then $\mu'(A\cap B)=\int_{G_{k+1}} \mu(gA)\mu(B)\, d\mu_i(g)=\mu'(A)\mu(B)=\mu'(A)\mu'(B)$, since $gB=B$ for $g\in G_{k+1}$.

Iterating we get a measure that satisfies the independence condition and is invariant under all of $G_1,...,G_n$.

[I realized that my original proof in the finite case didn't work, and I modified it along the lines of a suggestion in Uri Bader's comment.]

fix spelling
Source Link

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$. The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

The finite index-set case follows by iterating:

Lemma: If $G_1$ and $G_2$ are groups with finitely additive invariant measures $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, then there is a finitely addditiveadditive invariant measure $\mu$ on their direct product such that $\mu(A\times B)=\mu_1(A)\mu_2(B)$.

Proof of Lemma: Let $\mu(U) = \int_{G_2} \mu_1 ( \{ x_2 : (x_1,x_2) \in U \} ) d\mu_2(x_2)$. Integrals against f.a. measures are additive so $\mu$ is a f.a. measure, and invariance is obvious.

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$. The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

The finite index-set case follows by iterating:

Lemma: If $G_1$ and $G_2$ are groups with finitely additive invariant measures $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, then there is a finitely addditive invariant measure $\mu$ on their direct product such that $\mu(A\times B)=\mu_1(A)\mu_2(B)$.

Proof of Lemma: Let $\mu(U) = \int_{G_2} \mu_1 ( \{ x_2 : (x_1,x_2) \in U \} ) d\mu_2(x_2)$. Integrals against f.a. measures are additive so $\mu$ is a f.a. measure, and invariance is obvious.

It's been a while since I've worked with amenable groups and integrals against finitely additive measures, so I could be missing something, but it now seems to me that the question is easy. While apparently in general the direct product of amenable groups isn't amenable, the direct product of abelian groups is of course amenable. So we can use:

Theorem. If $G$ is the direct product of the groups $(G_i)_{i\in I}$ and $G$ is amenable, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure on $G$ that has independence for finite sequences of events depending respectively on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates.

We need only prove the Theorem for finite sets $I$. For let $F$ be the set of finite partitions of $I$, with a partial order given by $K\le L$ iff $L$ is at least as fine as $K$. For any partition $K\in F$, we consider $G$ to be the product of the $G^A=\prod_{i\in A} G_i$ as $A$ ranges over $K$. The measure $\mu_K$ we get from the finite index-set case of the theorem applied to the product of the $G^A$ will satisfy the independence condition for finite sequences of events depending on pairwise disjoint sets of coordinates that are in the algebra generated by $K$.

Let $\mu$ be a limit point of $\mu_K$ along the net $(F,\le)$. Then $\mu$ is the requisite measure on $G$.

The finite index-set case follows by iterating:

Lemma: If $G_1$ and $G_2$ are groups with finitely additive invariant measures $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, then there is a finitely additive invariant measure $\mu$ on their direct product such that $\mu(A\times B)=\mu_1(A)\mu_2(B)$.

Proof of Lemma: Let $\mu(U) = \int_{G_2} \mu_1 ( \{ x_2 : (x_1,x_2) \in U \} ) d\mu_2(x_2)$. Integrals against f.a. measures are additive so $\mu$ is a f.a. measure, and invariance is obvious.

use limit points instead of ultraproducts
Source Link
Loading
typo
Source Link
Loading
added condition that $G$ is amenable, because infinite direct products of amenable groups aren't always amenable, or so I've heard
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading