Timeline for New binomial coefficient identity?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2018 at 1:52 | answer | added | T. Amdeberhan | timeline score: 7 | |
| S Jan 31, 2018 at 14:49 | history | suggested | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor improvements
|
| Jan 31, 2018 at 14:17 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 31, 2018 at 14:49 | |||||
| Jan 31, 2018 at 3:07 | vote | accept | Zurab Silagadze | ||
| Jan 31, 2018 at 0:17 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | Can it be interpreted as an expected value? | |
| Jan 31, 2018 at 0:16 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2018 at 18:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2018 at 21:53 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2018 at 14:13 | answer | added | Ira Gessel | timeline score: 50 | |
| Jan 30, 2018 at 12:49 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | known or not, Mathematica immediately evaluates it: link to Wolfram Alpha | |
| Jan 30, 2018 at 12:28 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | It may appear in a different form. E.g., notice that $\binom{n+k}{n-k}\binom{2k}{k}=\binom{n+k}{n}\binom{n}{k}$. | |
| Jan 30, 2018 at 11:13 | history | asked | Zurab Silagadze | CC BY-SA 3.0 |