Timeline for When is a bilinear form equivalent to a trace form?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 30, 2018 at 18:15 | vote | accept | Somatic Custard | ||
Jan 29, 2018 at 12:57 | comment | added | user19475 | I seems that Hilbert's irreducibility theorem is used. | |
Jan 29, 2018 at 11:02 | history | edited | GreginGre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 371 characters in body
|
Jan 29, 2018 at 10:56 | history | edited | GreginGre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 371 characters in body
|
Jan 29, 2018 at 10:53 | comment | added | user19475 | The reference is Epkenhans, Martin, On trace forms of algebraic number fields. Arch. Math. (Basel) 60 (1993), no. 6, 527–529. Searching on MathSciNet for Epkenhans + trace gives some articles. | |
Jan 29, 2018 at 10:49 | history | edited | GreginGre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
Jan 29, 2018 at 10:43 | history | edited | GreginGre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 459 characters in body
|
Jan 29, 2018 at 10:33 | history | answered | GreginGre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |