Timeline for Uniqueness of tangent space given local injectivity of orthogonal projection onto it
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 28, 2018 at 14:17 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
(reformulated Lemma in equivalent way; deleted wrong proposition)
|
Jan 28, 2018 at 14:12 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 66 characters in body
|
Jan 28, 2018 at 2:11 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
Jan 28, 2018 at 1:51 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
Jan 28, 2018 at 1:43 | comment | added | Qfwfq | Clearly my lemma didn't make much sense, as stated. I have now edited it; the linked MSE answer is now (I think) not a counterexample to my lemma. But it is still a counterexample to its corollary (i.e. my "Proposition"). | |
Jan 28, 2018 at 1:39 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
(lemma stated in a non sound way)
|
Jan 28, 2018 at 1:11 | comment | added | Arrow | Dear Qfwfq, thank you very much for this detailed answer. At first glance I do not notice the local injectivity assumption anywhere. Does this mean the subset $\{(x,y,\sqrt[4]{x^2+y^2})\mid x,y\in \mathbb R\}\subset\mathbb R^3$ is not a counterexample as I claimed in my post? As stated in the link, any vector space containing the $z$-axis would satisfy the limit condition, particularly two distinct planes intersecting at the $z$-axis, in seeming contradiction to the last proposition of your answer. | |
Jan 28, 2018 at 0:49 | history | answered | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |