Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 21, 2018 at 14:10 comment added Tim Campion I just changed my accepted answer to this one since the edit actually answers the title question. The irony is that the edit answers the title question via a paper of Mohammad Golshani.... whose answer was the one I had previously accepted!
Jul 21, 2018 at 14:06 vote accept Tim Campion
Feb 28, 2018 at 20:48 history edited Julian Barathieu CC BY-SA 3.0
added 37 characters in body
Feb 28, 2018 at 20:39 history edited Julian Barathieu CC BY-SA 3.0
added 763 characters in body
Jan 31, 2018 at 16:28 comment added Paul Larson There's a different version of the history paper on my webpage which has references in it : users.miamioh.edu/larsonpb/Cabal_Determinacy.pdf
Jan 30, 2018 at 5:15 comment added Mohammad Golshani @JulianBarathieu The reference is The consistency strength of successive cardinals with the tree property
Jan 25, 2018 at 13:35 comment added Julian Barathieu If every regular cardinal $\geq\kappa$ has the tree property, then there will be infinitely many pairs of successive cardinals above the continuum with the tree property, whatever $\kappa$ you chose. So it always have high consistency strength by the result above.
Jan 24, 2018 at 22:34 comment added Tim Campion As I think about it more, I think what I really wanted to know about is the assertion "There exists a cardinal $\kappa$ such that for all regular $\lambda \geq \kappa$, $\lambda$ has the tree property". You're saying the consistency strength of this statement (or rather, a variant just for successors) for $\kappa = \aleph_2$ is very high (and possibly inconsistent). I suspect it doesn't make much difference to allow $\kappa$ to vary...
Jan 24, 2018 at 12:43 history answered Julian Barathieu CC BY-SA 3.0