Timeline for Reasons behind assuming the existence of Siegel zeros can be used to prove something stronger than assuming GRH?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 at 10:49 | vote | accept | Johnny T. | ||
| Jan 22, 2018 at 5:20 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Jan 21, 2018 at 12:33 | history | edited | Johnny T. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2018 at 12:29 | answer | added | Terry Tao | timeline score: 49 | |
| Jan 21, 2018 at 12:25 | history | edited | Johnny T. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2018 at 11:37 | comment | added | Johnny T. | @SylvainJULIEN true. it is fixed now. thanks. | |
| Jan 21, 2018 at 11:36 | history | edited | Johnny T. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 21, 2018 at 10:54 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | Your question is interesting but I think you should modify a bit your title, as it sounds as if assuming the existence of a Siegel zero would be stronger than GRH, which seems to mean GRH would be a consequence thereof, which is wrong. | |
| Jan 21, 2018 at 9:58 | history | asked | Johnny T. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |